fbpx

Climate Change and Agriculture: How to Adapt to New Agronomic Challenges

Climate Change and Agriculture:

How to Adapt to New Agronomic Challenges

1. Climate and Agriculture: An Inseparable Relationship

The climate-agriculture binomial is inseparable. Every agricultural practice is born from a landscape, and that landscape is shaped by the climate. If, as is often said, a region’s cuisine is its geography served on a plate, we could assert that its agriculture is the direct reflection of the environment: temperatures, rainfall, humidity, hours of sunlight, combined with physical factors such as soil quality, altitude, or slope.

For centuries, this balance between climate and agriculture has defined what is grown, how it is grown, and with what results. However, today that balance is being disrupted by a new variable that challenges our certainties: climate change. If the climate changes, the landscape changes, and with it, the crops and the entire agricultural model.

This blog invites you to reflect on this unprecedented transformation. Our goal is not only to analyze the current challenges but also to highlight adaptation opportunities and solutions that are already available. Because the great challenge is not simply to produce more and better, but to do so while caring for the planet, ensuring accessible food, and ensuring profitability for those who cultivate the land.

Throughout this text, we will address the main climatic and edaphic factors that condition agricultural production, the impact of climate change on crops, adaptation strategies, and the role that biocontrol can play in this new paradigm.

2. Advances of the 20th Century and the New Climate Challenge

During the 20th century, agriculture made significant progress thanks to the reduction of uncertainty factors that historically limited production. The genetic selection of seeds, the use of synthetic fertilizers, the development of phytosanitary products, and mechanization allowed for precise control over previously uncontrollable aspects, increasing crop efficiency and yield.

However, there is one factor that still escapes human control: the climate.

Agricultural work has always been linked to weather uncertainty. Farmers, the true protagonists of the field, have learned to live with better and worse years depending on climatic conditions. However, in recent decades, climate change has introduced a new dimension of unpredictability: greater variability in rainfall, extreme heat or cold events, intense droughts, torrential rains, violent hailstorms, etc.

These phenomena not only complicate agronomic planning but also force us to reconsider which crops make sense in certain regions. Even those that have been characteristic of an area for generations may cease to be viable if the climatic environment drastically changes.

At a time when efficiency, precision, and profitability are key pillars for the economic sustainability of the agricultural sector, this new instability poses unprecedented challenges.

The increase in global average temperature, changes in rainfall cycles, and the growing frequency of extreme phenomena are having direct effects on crops.

Below, we detail some of the most relevant ones:

Table 1. Climatic Phenomena Aggravated by Climate Change and Their Agricultural Impact
Climatic Phenomenon Description Impact on Agriculture
Temperature Rise Increase in average annual temperature and extreme episodes. Thermal stress on plants, lower yield, altered flowering, accelerated ripening.
Extended Droughts Extended periods without sufficient precipitation. Decreased water availability, water stress, soil salinization.
Intense Rains Heavy rainfall concentrated in a short period of time. Soil erosion, nutrient loss, flooding, increased fungal incidence.
Violent Hailstorms Frequent episodes of large hailstorms. Physical damage to crops, wounds that act as gateways to infections.

3. Visible Impacts: Crops in Crisis and Extreme Phenomena

The impacts of climate change on agriculture are no longer a future forecast: they are happening today. Numerous crops, essential for global and local food production, are seeing their viability compromised in various regions of the world.

Some significant examples:

Cocoa

Theobroma cacao
It suffers from reduced rainfall and an increase in warm winds, which directly affects its flowering and grain development.

Coffee:

Coffea
Increasingly high temperatures force the search for new altitudes or regions for cultivation, with the corresponding increase in costs.

Rice

Oryza sativa
Extremely sensitive to heatwaves and water scarcity, factors that affect its productivity and quality.

Mediterranean Vine

Theobroma cacao
In coastal areas, the combination of prolonged droughts and high temperatures is calling into question its medium-term viability, forcing a reconsideration of varieties, planting dates, or even abandoning certain cultivation areas.

These examples highlight that climate change is not a uniform phenomenon but presents multiple territorial expressions that require responses adapted to each agricultural context.

4. The Dual Role of Agriculture: Victim and Emissions Source

In addition to being affected, agriculture also contributes to climate change. According to recent data, agricultural activity, along with forestry and land-use change (AFOLU, for its acronym in English), accounts for approximately 18% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Understanding the origin of these emissions is fundamental to designing effective mitigation strategies.

Emission Sources Table
Emission Source Description Main GHG
Enteric fermentation Digestion of ruminants like cows and sheep. CH₄ (methane)
Synthetic fertilizers Emission of nitrogen oxides due to excess nitrogen in the soil. N₂O (nitrous oxide)
Land use change Clearing of forests to convert into agricultural lands or pastures. CO₂ (carbon dioxide)
Machinery and fuels Intensive use of agricultural machinery powered by fossil fuels. CO₂

Table 3. Main Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Agriculture

To ensure future food production, agriculture must transform. The goal is to maintain productivity, ensure the economic viability of farms, and reduce their environmental impact at the same time. Several strategic lines have already been identified as effective:

Strategies Table
Strategy Objective Additional Benefit
Regenerative agriculture Improve soil health and capture carbon. Greater fertility, structure, and water retention.
Reduction of chemical fertilizers Avoid excess nitrogen and N₂O emissions. Economic savings, less contamination of aquifers.
Use of biocontrol and bioproducts Replace chemical products with beneficial microorganisms. Greater biodiversity, natural control of pests and diseases.
Renewable energy on farms Replace diesel with solar, wind, or biomass energy. Energy autonomy, reduced carbon footprint.
Precision agriculture Apply water and nutrients only where and when needed. Efficiency in resource use and improved yields.

Table 4. Key Strategies for Climate-Responsible Agriculture

5. Political Transition and Real Solutions: Between the Green Deal and the Field

The balance between food production at affordable prices, environmental sustainability, and agricultural profitability is at the center of the current debate. In this context, recent farmer mobilizations across Europe reflect the tensions generated by this transition, especially in relation to the European Green Deal and the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

The European Green Deal is an ambitious and necessary commitment to achieve climate neutrality in the European Union by 2050. Within this framework, agriculture plays a central role. The ‘Farm to Fork’ strategy proposes a profound transformation of the European agri-food system, with objectives such as:

– Achieving 25% of agricultural land certified as organic.

– Reducing the use of chemical plant protection products by 50% before 2030.

These goals, although aimed at a more sustainable model, have generated controversy in parts of the agricultural sector. Some agricultural organizations, unions, and producers argue that these measures reduce the competitiveness of European agriculture, increase costs, and make it more difficult to maintain traditional crops.

Since 1991, the European Union has been removing many chemical active substances from the market for being harmful to human health or the environment. This withdrawal has been interpreted by many farmers as a direct threat to their productive model, especially due to the lack of effective authorized alternatives.

However, in our opinion, the problem does not lie in the gradual elimination of harmful chemicals (a necessary process supported by scientific evidence), but in the slow pace at which national and European authorities approve new biocontrol products. A paradigmatic example is the biofungicide RootDei Biocontrol®, formulated from the T34 strain of Trichoderma asperellum. Although the active substance was approved in 2013 after four years of evaluation, and other products based on the same strain were already on the market, obtaining approval for RootDei Biocontrol® in Germany for the control of Rhizoctonia spp. in potatoes took more than two additional years of processing. To achieve this, 15 efficacy trials had to be submitted and evaluated.

This bureaucratic delay occurs in a context where many chemical plant protection products used in potatoes are being reduced or banned, leaving farmers with no effective and sustainable options. Moreover, it is common for the legal deadlines for evaluating new products to be systematically violated.

Beyond opposing change, the sector’s demands should focus on demanding greater agility from governments and the European Commission in the processes of evaluating and authorizing biocontrol products. These products, based on natural microorganisms with low or no environmental impact, are key to maintaining productivity and protecting human and environmental health.

6. A Professional and Sustainable Agriculture: The Model Europe Needs

One of the most repeated arguments against the expansion of organic farming is its lower yield compared to conventional farming. Although this difference exists in some crops, especially cereals, it is often a partial and out-of-context comparison.

On one hand, current organic farming has a very limited catalog of authorized products, both fertilizers and phytosanitary products. On the other hand, the conventional system employs intensive technologies and resources that, although effective in the short term, have a high environmental cost.

With the development of biocontrol tools, biostimulants, and precision technologies, it is possible to close this productivity gap. In fact, numerous trials and products registered in countries such as the United States show that a farming system based on biological principles is not only viable but can be more profitable and resilient if farmers have the right tools.

The debate on sustainability also affects the farming model. In Europe, three main types of farms coexist:

1. Small farms whose livelihood comes primarily from rural tourism or complementary activities. Food production is secondary.

2. Small or medium-sized, technologically advanced farms, whose main activity is professional and competitive agriculture.

3. Large agro-industrial farms, often vertically integrated into groups that control everything from production to marketing.

Each model serves distinct functions. But if the goal is to ensure healthy, sustainable, and affordable food, settle rural populations, and foster innovation, the focus should be on the second group: medium-sized professional farms, capable of adapting, investing, and applying good agricultural practices without relying on subsidies or investment funds.

7. Conclusion: Sustainable Agriculture is Possible (and Urgent)

Climate change forces us to reconsider agricultural production as we know it. This reconsideration cannot be postponed. It requires combining technological innovation (smart irrigation systems, precision agriculture, plant covers, use of beneficial microorganisms) with a political framework that facilitates access to new sustainable solutions.

Instead of blocking change, public administrations must align with the ecological transition of agriculture. This includes:

  • Speeding up the approval of effective and safe biocontrol products.
  • Investing in technical training to help farmers adopt these new tools.
  • Ensuring agricultural profitability by protecting those who produce responsibly and sustainably.

If you are a farmer, technician, or distributor:

Now is the time to lead the change.

At Biocontrol Technologies, we believe that the future of agriculture lies in solutions that respect the environment and ensure the viability of farming. We advocate for agriculture based on knowledge, science, and innovation.

Contact us, learn about our biocontrol solutions, and join the movement toward efficient, safe, and climate-responsible agriculture.

Post A Comment

YOUR CAPTCHA HERE

Logo Biocontrol Technologies SL
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.